Welcome to 21stCentury Revolution.com

“I just want to be clear from the start given the name of the website, that the revolution should be a non-violent one. A new renaissance of balance & harmony through art, music, and creativity.”

I would like to just prove to everyone who visits this site how the so called virus has only ever existed as a computer mock up! It has never existed in the biosphere only “In Silico”

Therefore if it doesn’t exist in nature it can not infect anyone! It only exists as a computer model.

See a short vid proving so broken down into simple terms so we can all understand below followed by:

In Silico based Whole Genome Phylogenetic Analysis of Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Just hit the download button to save a copy.

In Silico meaning in-silicon — in a computer: https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=In+Silico+

Below a Court Case in South Africa asking for foundational material evidence of SARS-COV-2 NOT a computer model – physical evidence.

The Corona Crisis

“This corona crisis, according to all we know today, must be renamed a “Corona Scandal” and those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages. On a political level, everything must be done to make sure that no one will ever again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity or to attempt to manipulate us with their corrupt agendas. And for this reason I will now explain to you how and where an international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort case ever, the corona fraud scandal, which has meanwhile unfolded into probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed”. Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Tort Lawyer LL.M.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich being interviewed by Mike Adams here

And Dr. Fuellmich interviewing Dr. David Martin must see here

TESTING

The whole foundation of this con is the The RT-PCR TEST!!!

I can’t emphasise this enough, If people refused to be tested this con game would end overnight. Because the test that they used is not a diagnostic test, it doesn’t mean that you are sick. It was invented to be used in a laboratory to amplify genetic material that the eye can’t see to an amplification that the human eye can see and thus be able to work with it in a lab.

Landmark Court Case won in the Lisbon Court of Appeals Portugal

And more damming, smoking gun proof the PCR test is a fraud is the landmark case in the Portuguese appeal court in Lisbon where four German nationals were quarantined in a hotel in the Azores because one of them pinged positive on the PCR shortly after arrival.

They cleverly sited Habeas Corpus which means in Latin: “have the body”. See definition here which originates from Common law (The Law of the Land) or in other countries; Natural Law, as opposed to STATUTE LAW (much more on this later). Habeas Corpus is an old common law writ that still exists also in commonwealth countries or ex commonwealth countries. See legal definition here

Once you site Habeas Corpus it means the accused claim that they have been falsely imprisoned and they are put in front of a judge in a certain amount of time – usually 24 hrs.

The judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection. See the case here You will have to utilise google translate as it is obviously in Portuguese.

The study they site in the court as evidence that the PCR is so inaccurate is here

MARGARIDA RAMOS DE ALMEIDA 1783 / 20.7T8PDL.L1-3

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists, ”which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”

The study [by Jaafar et al] concludes:

“It can be observed that at Ct = 25, up to 70% of patients remain positive in culture and that at Ct = 30 this value drops to 20%. At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive”.

THAT MEANS 97% ARE FALSE at a Ct rate of 35 the study proves. So at 40 or 45 Ct can we say 100% false positives? Absolutely.

Now further proof Look at this CDC Document:

CDC 2019-NOVEL CORONAVIRUS (2019-nCoV)

Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel

INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE PAPER EFFECTIVE: 07/13/2020

(Link to full paper further down) Buried on page 38:

And then you have the inventor of the RT-PCR test – the late Kary Banks Mullis 1944-2019 who won a Nobel Prize for the invention stated it is NOT a diagnostic tool.

He states in the above video that you can find anything you want with PCR and “it doesn’t tell you that you are sick” That is why we have perfectly healthy people that ping positive and are told they are infected.

This is why for the first time in history they had to invent A-symptomatic cases. You can test positive for a deadly disease in the morning, but run a marathon in the afternoon no problem!!

Fauci

Fauci admits on camera in the vid below that at 35 ct (cycle threshold) the result is meaningless. The health services in the US have been testing with the PCR running up to 40 ct and the NHS in the UK 45 ct!

The WHO (World Health Organisation) recommends ct at 40 cycles which most labs in the US will use and Europe. Meaning 100% false positives according to Doctor Fauci – “Meaningless”!

Furthermore; when you get your results back from the lab it doesn’t state what ct (cycle threshold) the lab has the test calibrated to, does it? So you ping positive, with a “meaningless” result with the Ct they have it set at, get a piece of paper through the door telling you are infected with a “deadly disease” BUT in the process never informing you at what Ct the lab has the test calibrated too! I think I feel a lawsuit coming on.

I can say that as a result the UK economy has been destroyed in the terms of small to medium enterprises. Look at New York, those businesses are never coming back. All ruined on the basis of a fake test.

Fauci says in the video that it must be frustrating for the patient! Well not just that Dr but whole economies have been shut down, small businesses closed never to come back, peoples mental health devastated, let’s not forget the psychological effects on children being told they are a Bio-hazard and must stay away from their Grandparents because they are told they are a health threat to their own families. Peoples livelihoods have been destroyed and again on the basis of fake cases; PCR and fake deaths; FALSIFYING DEATH CERTIFICATES ( see below video). Well how do you get your cases Doctor? with a completely inaccurate fake test.

Here’s what the inventor of the PCR test who won a Nobel Prize for it said about Fauci:

ON THE UK GOVERNMENT WEBSITE SINCE MARCH 19 2020 (and still to this day):

Status of COVID-19

As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be an HCID in the UK. There are many diseases which can cause serious illness which are not classified as HCIDs.

The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.

The ACDP is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID: the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens’ decision to reclassify COVID-19 as no longer being considered a High Consequence Infectious Disease 

BBC: Public Health England Falsifying Covid-19 death rates

Here in the below video this lady live on the BBC states, (Quote: “ Anyone who has EVER tested positive for Coronavirus are included in the death figures”) that statisticians from Oxford University have found anomalies when Public Health England are recording data. Public Health England are re-designating other causes of death as COVID-19 if you have EVER pinged positive on the 100% inaccurate PCR test. So just to paraphrase here; if you test positive for COVID (with the fake test) and are treated in hospital then discharged, then a month later get hit by a bus you are registered as a COVID death! Watch!

PROFESSOR LOCKDOWN

Neil Ferguson “Professor Lockdown”

“In the world of mathematical epidemiology, Ferguson is renowned for his accomplishments, temperament, and work ethic”.

Just one problem with that; A broken clock has a better track record of accuracy!!!!

Predictions

2001: His computer models predicted 150,000 could die of Mad Cow disease – 177 did. As a result 6 million animals were slaughtered to the detriment of the farmers and the UK economy at a cost of 10 billion. 65 farmers committed suicide.

2005: The Bird flu pandemic he predicted 200 million could die – it was in the low hundreds actually.

2009: Swine flu, he predicted 65,000 could die, it was below 500 – 457 to be exact.

Then his predictions lead to a crescendo for the CORONAVIRUS scam in 2020 by predicting on March 16th 510,000 people could die if the government didn’t abandon its current strategy of allowing the disease to spread. As of writing today 13^th April 2021 according to Worldometers.info 127,100 deaths have been recorded in the UK.

He also stated 2.5 million in the US could die. To date there has been 559,172 according to CDC data. His work has also informed the strategies pursued by the White House and the governments of France and Germany.

The above data is from an article by Business Insider see full piece here

Notice of Intended PCP For Mass Murder By Government Policy

The following Notice of Intended Private Criminal Prosecution for mass murder by UK Government policy is an amended version of the notice served upon the Secretary of State for the Department of Health and Social Care last week, which will also be served by email and registered post.

NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION

MASS MURDER BY GOVERNMENT POLICY

1. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus”. However, the genome sequence for SARS-COV-2, released in January 2020, proved that the test to identify its presence was created in the absence of virus samples¹. We therefore contend that no virus isolate of SARS COV 2 exists, and that a disease called Covid 19 has not caused excess deaths in the UK.
2. Our assertion is supported by public documents confirming that no pure isolate of the virus exists². Furthermore, publicly available death data proves that the so called “first wave of COVID”, and excess deaths in England, only occurred ONCE the pandemic was announced and lockdowns commenced on 23/03/2020, and that a “virus” which was not a HCID, may have been in circulation as early as October 2019.³ 
3. On 3rd March 2020, the UK Government scientific advisor echoed the Prime Minister, when he said: “Let me be absolutely clear that for the overwhelming majority of people who contract the “virus”, this will be a mild disease from which they will speedily and fully recover as we’ve already seen”. In line with this, on 13/03/2020, the threat from the virus was officially downgraded from a HCID to a NOID by the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens [ACDP].⁴.
4. However, this decision to downgrade from HCID to NOID was highly controversial because of the WHO’s declaration of a worldwide High Consequence Infectious Disease [HCID] two days previously on 11/03/2020, upon the advice of Neil Ferguson of Imperial College. In other words, the downgrading is an implicit contradiction of Ferguson’s triggering of a worldwide health emergency.                                                                                                                                                      
5. Remarkably, following the private announcement of the downgrading on 13^th March 2020, and the subsequent public announcement of the downgrading on 19/03/2020, there appears to have been a premeditated decision to use this unproven ‘pandemic’ as justification to impose measures and medication which went on to kill people. This was in turn used to justify the lockdown measures, which themselves were one of the driving forces of the deaths they claimed to be trying to avoid. This premeditation to cause deaths of course amounts to mass murder by government policy.
6. There is support for this argument when we look at government policy decisions, which simply put, make no sense. On 17/03/2020, 4 days after the private downgrading mentioned above, the NHS wrote to all hospitals asking them to free-up the maximum possible number of beds by urgently discharging any patients they could.¹
7. Many of these patients were discharged to care homes, some of which were given ultimatums forcing them to take more patients than they were equipped to provide care for. In addition, the NHS cancelled all ‘non-urgent’ treatments. 
8. Why was this policy invented at all given scientific advice on 03/03/2020, and why was it not reversed, given the downgrading on 13/03/2020 by the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens?
9. It is our contention that the excess deaths in the first wave occurred AS A RESULT of the relentless implementation of this policy, which was coupled with the inappropriate use of respiratory depressing medications such as Midazolam during the same period. This is how the excess deaths occurred. They were NOT because of a novel virus, isolation of which, according to long held standards, has never occurred.
10. Our extrapolated data on community Midazolam prescribing supports the above allegation, along with the data on how and where deaths during this time period occurred.
11. Following the letter of 17/03/2020 from the NHS, bed occupancy in England reduced from the usual 90% to an average of 63% in the spring quarter of 2020. In addition, there was no influx of ‘large numbers of inpatients requiring respiratory support’. Accident and emergency (A&E) departments saw a huge decrease in attendances and overall admitted patient care decreased significantly during the same period.
12. Of those patients who were admitted to hospital and residents who were discharged to care homes, the outcomes can only be described as devastating. We assert that those outcomes were engineered. When we look at mortality, figures show that hospital and care home death ratios increased during the “first wave” lockdown period².   
13. Shockingly, 91% of “with COVID” deaths during the first lockdown were of people with any sort of disability³. It is impossible for a ‘virus’ to discriminate in such a manner, and therefore we contend these deaths must have been as a result of very nefarious policies. These policies were blanket DNRs and mandatory prescribed medications, two factors which have contributed to most other “non disability” deaths during the first lockdown period.                                        
14. Data proves that up to 13/05/2020, deaths in care homes from all causes were 159% higher than at the start of “the COVID-19 outbreak”⁴. In April 2020, the ratio of excess deaths in English care homes was almost three times that of the prior five years’ average. It is not a mere coincidence that during the same month, prescribing of Midazolam increased by more than 100%⁵. There is a clear correlation between policy, prescribing of Midazolam and deaths, which simply cannot be overlooked.
15. Further,more during the period 2 March to 12 June 2020, 18,562 residents of care homes in England died, supposedly “with COVID-19”, including 18,168 people aged 65 and over. This represented almost 40% of all deaths involving “COVID-19” in England during this period ⁶
16. In addition to the above, during the first lockdown there was an unbelievable policy change in care homes⁷. The change restricted access for residents’ families. This removed crucial oversight of treatment along with safeguards. Also, support services such as SALT, chiropody, physiotherapy and in house GP visits, were removed.
17. Simply put, care homes were turned into death camps and their inmates were targeted for elimination. Staffing levels dropped due to a policy of self-isolation for anything akin to a sniffle, and this further pressured care homes who then had a ratio of staff to patients that was unworkable.
18. We contend this was not an accident, and instead was done by design. Only a fool, or perhaps a madman, would implement such policies and not realise the inevitable consequences. Only a fool or a madman would say they were necessary after the down grading of Covid 19 from an HCID to a NOID on 13/03/2020.
19. As we have already stated, we assert that the above were premeditated policies, to cause excess deaths in care homes (as well as in the community generally).  It is without doubt that family surveillance in care homes, at a time when staff limits were stretched, could have stopped avoidable deaths. Furthermore, had support services been available, we very much doubt that the over prescribing of respiratory depressing medication would have been either necessary, or allowed to transpire.
20. Bizarrely, in addition to the above, all official inspections were suspended during the first lockdown, leading to less and less oversight. Very worryingly, the use of blanket DNRs,⁸ (now acknowledged as a fact by Matt Hancock), as well as do not admit to hospital orders, were imposed, and undoubtedly led to countless avoidable deaths.
21. Lockdown restrictions eased at the start of June 2020 and up to the start of the second national lockdown, there was NEGATIVE excess deaths in care homes (a ratio of 0.96 versus expected levels). This fall in deaths occurred in the absence of any ‘vaccines’ or alternative treatment for so called Covid 19.
22. We therefore contend that the initial wave of deaths during the first lockdown were driven by policy decisions by this government and Midazolam prescribing. These deaths were in fact accelerated deaths, rather than excess deaths, and these accelerated deaths were created for political and policy gain, to feed a narrative of a deadly pandemic which simply did not, and still does not, exist.
23. Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford professor, has labelled lockdowns “the single biggest public health mistake in history”⁹.  95% of hospital COVID-labelled deaths occurred DURING lockdown. How is this possible if lockdowns save lives?                                                                                                                                     
24. We contend that lockdowns kill, but moreover that they are designed to do so. However, lockdowns alone do not provide the significant number of deaths needed to create the illusion of a pandemic. This is the primary reason we have looked at Midazolam prescribing during this period.
25. It is a well-known fact that Midazolam is a respiratory depressing drug¹. It creates the very respiratory symptoms of so called “COVID-19”. Used in copious amounts in conjunction with lockdowns, Midazolam led to premature deaths. The data we have extrapolated on community Midazolam prescribing supports this, along with the pertinent observations above, about where and how accelerated deaths occurred.
26. Given our assertions that government policy and Midazolam prescribing have caused accelerated deaths, and our assertion that this was designed and premeditated by certain individuals within and advising this government, we have some questions that we wish to put to you.
27. Our allegations described above are of the most serious kind. In the absence of satisfactory answers from you to our questions and given the supporting evidence we are presenting with this notice, we wish to make clear that we will assume you cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt, that what we have asserted about a government premeditated policy of mass murder is false.
28. Let us be clear, this is your chance to answer the questions posed and give proof that our allegations and assertions are wrong. If you can do that by bringing evidence to the contrary of ours, we will accept that we have perhaps misinterpreted our evidence, albeit in good faith.
29. However, you will need to produce sufficient material evidence to rebut our allegations, and in the absence of the same, we will pursue a Private Criminal Prosecution based on the statements made herein. 
30. Of the 50,335 deaths which occurred in March to June 2020 involving COVID-19 in England and Wales, 45,859 (91.1%) had at least one pre-existing condition, while 4,476 (8.9%) had none. It is for those people and their families that we so urgently seek a just outcome in this the most serious type of criminal proceedings imaginable. See more here